GEOENGINEERING
Vad heter de moln som planen lägger ut...?
"Why in the World are They Spraying?"
"NASA rapporterade för 5 år sedan att jorden nu tar emot 20% mindre solljus än 10 år tidigare. Efter 16 år av förnekelse, medger Vita huset vetenskapsexpert John P Holdren nu att de har "testmanipulerat" jordens atmosfär med Bariumsalter Aluminium oxid och andra giftiga ämnen tillsatt i flygbränslet. Dags att vi ifrågasätter vad som sprejas över våra huvuden varje dag via flygplanen".
Geoengineering explained by G. Edward Griffin
Extraordinary interview with G. Edward Griffin at the premiere of his documentary "What in the World are They Spraying". The distinguished Mr. Griffin, author of the conspiracy blockbuster "The Creature from Jekyll Island", which exposed the sinister creation of the Federal Reserve, now has upgraded his talents to include documentary film production. He expounds on the evidence of chemtrails and reasons why we're being sprayed and what we can do about it. This proves the existence of chemtrails for the non-believer, and it explains for the conspiracy experts out there how the elite expect to get away with this.
Retired USDA Biologist Francis Mangels on Geoengineering
Chemtrails, US Military Ownership-Global Weather Explained by the Massachusetts School of Law's
Geoengineering Från wikipedia
""The modern concept of geoengineering (or climate engineering) proposes to deliberately manipulate a planet's climate, typically the Earth's, to counteract the effects of global warming from greenhouse gas emissions. Other uses of the word sometimes occur, meaning geotechnical engineering.""
G. Edward Griffin Talks Candidly About Chemtrails/
...........................................................................................................................................................................
What in the World are They Spraying?
Michael Murphy, Co Producer of the new film, "What in the World are They Spraying?," joins Gary Franchi at RTR studios to educate us about chemtrails.
Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up
Rosalind Peterson of California Skywatch was a certified U.S.D.A. Farm Service Agency Crop Loss Adjustor working in more than ten counties throughout California. She now spearheads a watchdog group that monitors uncontrolled experimental weather modification programs, atmospheric heating and testing programs, and ocean and atmospheric experimental geoengineering programs Peterson is at the forefront of the chemtrail research field and how the unexplained patterns that scar our skies are "causing detrimental human health effects and environmental degradation."
In this 1-hour plus video exclusive for Prison Planet.tv members, Peterson reveals how she was first spurred to investigate chemtrails after being alerted to them by someone at the Mendocino County Probation Department. Peterson then began to intensely study the phenomenon and note that aircraft producing the trails would circle the county in a clock-like loop, covering the entire area with a cloudy haze in as little as three hours. Peterson cites NASA studies showing that the chemtrails turn into man-made clouds, exacerbating artificial climate change. However, Peterson states her contention that NASA is attempting to cover-up the true nature of chemtrails and convince people that they are a natural phenomenon, a ruse dutifully parroted by top weather and satellite observatories, who as Peterson explains acknowledge the fact that man-made chemtrails are changing the weather yet still label them as natural weather fronts in their public broadcasts.
Peterson shows a map provided by the FAA which reveals how "intra-flights" - mainly of military origin - are causing the chemtrails by flying in loops around counties in flight paths that differ substantially from normal airline trajectories. The flights have no other obvious purpose than to disperse chemtrails because they have no fixed destination, they merely fly around and around in circles.
As proponents of geoengineering like Obama's science czar John P. Holdren have proposed, blocking sunlight is a primary effect of chemtrailing, and sulphur could be one of the chemicals being dispersed by these trails. As Peterson explains, sulphur has been linked with a host of health problems, which is why California removed it from diesel fuel in the first place.
After studying water quality samples for the state of California stretching back some 30 years, Peterson found that starting from 1990, water sources were all registering unusual spikes in certain chemicals at precisely the same time, namely arsenic, barium, aluminum, calcium, manganese, magnesium, lead and iron. By measuring the spikes in these chemicals in the water supply with similar spikes in these chemicals in air quality samples, Peterson was able to conclude that the cause was airborne and that it had to be coming from the atmosphere. Peterson notes that mixing aluminum and barium creates clouds and that NASA experiments based around this concept were coinciding with the spikes in such chemicals measured in water and air quality samples.
This is an enlightening, detailed and documented explanation of how chemtrailing is being conducted, who is responsible for it and what the consequences are for our health and the environment.
"Rosalind Peterson offers insight and commentary on the compelling issues surrounding our health, agriculture, climate change, geoengineering, experimental weather modification and more. It is our hope that you will find this collection of views and opinions interesting, informative and worthwhile. Ultimately, we hope that you become inspired to act. Enjoy!"
Former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson Says Chemtrail Death Dumps Must Be Stopped
Former FBI Chief, Ted L. Gunderson, makes a statement regarding the chemtrail "death dumps", otherwise know as air crap, on January 12, 2011. Ted says the following: "The death dumps, otherwise known as chemical trails, are being dropped and sprayed throughout the United States and England, Scotland, Ireland, and Northern Europe. I have personally seen them not only in the United States, but in Mexico and in Canada. Birds are dying around the world. Fish are dying by the hundreds of thousands around the world. This is genocide. This is poison. This is murder by the United Nations. This element within our society that is doing this must be stopped. I happen to know of two of the locations where the airplanes are that dump this crap on us. Four of the planes are out of the Air National Guard in Lincoln, Nebraska. And, the other planes are out of Fort Sill, Oklahoma. I personally have observed the planes that were standing still in Nebraska - Lincoln, Nebraska - at the Air National Guard. They have no markings on them. They are huge, bomber-like airplanes with no markings. This is a crime: a crime against humanity, a crime against America, a crime against the citizens of this great country. The must be stopped. WHAT IS WRONG WITH CONGRESS? This has an affect on their population, and their people, and their friends, and their relatives, and themselves. What's wrong with them? What's wrong with the pilots who are flying these airplanes and dumping this crap, this poison, on their own families? Somebody has to do something about it. Somebody in Congress has to step forward and stop it now. Thank you. I'm Ted Gunderson." For more details, visit aircrap.org
FNs klimatpanel IPCC vill utreda klimatlösningar genom geomanipuliering som t.ex. chemtrails
Läckta dokument inför det viktiga IPCC-mötet i Lima tyder på att FN-organet är ute efter att bromsa koldioxidutsläpp med hjälp av tekniska lösningar snarare än samtal.
Textbearbetning: Peter Pettersson
Ljusare grödor, aerosoler i stratosfären och järnfilspån i havet är några av de åtgärder som övervägs av ledande forskare i syfte att genomföra en ”geomanipulering” (”geo-engineering”) av jordens klimat, visar läckta dokument från FN:organet IPCC.
I en åtgärd som tyder på att FN och de rika länder är desperata över att nå enighet under de kommande klimatförhandlingarna, kommer amerikanska, brittiska och andra västerländska forskare att beskriva en rad idéer för att manipulera världens klimat för att minska koldioxidutsläppen. Och de accepterar risken att även om idéerna teoretiskt sätt skulle kunna fungera, skullle de lika gärna kunna få oavsiktliga och till och med oåterkalleliga konsekvenser.
Dokumenten, som har läckt ut från Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) före ett möte den 20–22 juni med en grupp experter på geomanipulering i Lima i Peru, visar att omkring 60 forskare kommer att föreslå eller försöka bedöma en rad radikala åtgärder, inklusive:
* sprängning av sulfat-aerosoler i stratosfären för att reflektera solljuset tillbaka ut i rymden; * deponering av stora mängder järnfilspån i haven; * manipulering av grödor genom bioteknik i syfte ge dem en ljusare färg för att reflektera solljus, och * att hålla nere mängden cirrusmoln.
Andra förslag som troligen komma att föreslås innefattar att: spreja ut havsvatten i atmosfären för att bilda moln som ska reflektera solljuset bort från jorden; gräva ner träkol; måla gator och hustak vita i stor skala; kalka haven; hitta olika sätt att suga bort växthusgaser ur luften och att deponera värme djupt ned i haven.
Denna vecka har mer än 125 miljö-, utvecklings- och mänskliga rättigheter-grupper från 40 länder publicerat ett brev som skickats till Rajendra Pachauri, den nobelprisvinnande chefen för IPCC, och varnat för att FN-organet inte har något mandat att pröva lagligheten eller den politiska lämpligheten av att använda geomanipulering.
”Att fråga en grupp forskare inom geomanipulering om mer forskning bör göras, är som att fråga björnar om de skulle vilja ha honung”, säger brevet, som är undertecknat av grupper som inbegriper Friends of the Earth International, Via Campesina och ETC.
Icke oväntat kretsar oron över IPCC: s möte kring vem som ska bestämma vilken typ av geomanipulering som ska genomföras, och hur den bör regleras och övervakas. Vissa projekt kan, om de fungerar, oavsiktligt förändra vädermönster och eventuellt också påverka jordbruk och försörjning i några av de mest utsatta områdena i världen.
Ett av argumenten som förs fram i ovan nämnda brev liknar det som förs fram av de som är skeptiska till den antropogen teorin om temperaturökningen på Jorden, nämligen att geomanipulering inte är en vetenskaplig fråga utan en politisk, och att de tekniska lösningar som geomanipulering erbjuder inte är en äkta, utan ”en falsk lösning på klimatkrisen”.
Vissa frågar sig i ljuset av detta om det finns ytterligare paralleller mellan dessa två ståndpunkter.
Enligt sammanfattningarna av FN-dokumenten föreslår Georgina Mace, professor i ”Conservation Science vid Imperial College”, London, att de viktigaste, ledande principerna framöver bör vara att geomanipulering är en ”kollektiv nyttighet”, det bör inte heller finnas något deltagande från allmänheten i planerna eller några oberoende bedömningar av konsekvenserna.
”Geomanipulering är inte en kollektiv nyttighet, utan kan vara en gigantisk internationell skandal med förödande konsekvenser för de fattiga”, säger Diana Bronson, forskare inom den internationella icke-statliga organisationen ETC Group.
I dokumenten accepterar många forskare den stora osäkerheten kring tekniken.
Den vetenskapliga styrgruppen för mötet, som kommer att bedöma teknik, innehåller dock många kända förespråkare för geomanipulering, vilka har krävt offentliga medel för att genomföra storskaliga experiment, och forskare som har patent på geomanipuleringsteknik eller ekonomiska intressen i tekniken.
Källor: www.guardian.co.uk
Los Angeles Chemtrails Meetup Group Freeway Bannering 6-3-11
Congressman Joseph R Pitts Exposes Eugenics Program on House Floor
President Obamas top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book in which he advocated the formation of a planetary regime that would use a global police force to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children. The concepts outlined in Holdrens 1977 book Ecoscience, which he co-authored with close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich, were so shocking that a February 2009 Front Page Magazine story on the subject was largely dismissed as being outlandish because people couldnt bring themselves to believe that it could be true. It was only when another Internet blog obtained the book and posted screenshots that the awful truth about what Holdren had actually committed to paper actually began to sink in. This issue is more prescient than ever because Holdren and his colleagues are now at the forefront of efforts to combat climate change through similarly insane programs focused around geoengineering the planet. As we reported in April, Holdren recently advocated Large-scale geoengineering projects designed to cool the Earth, such as shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the suns rays, which many have pointed out is already occurring via chemtrails. Ecoscience discusses a number of ways in which the global population could be reduced to combat what the authors see as mankinds greatest threat overpopulation. In each case, the proposals are couched in sober academic rhetoric, but the horrifying foundation of what Holdren and his co-authors are advocating is clear. These proposals include; - Forcibly and unknowingly sterilizing the entire population by adding infertility drugs to the nations water and food supply.